On 9/22/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see the column rename as an
> API change issue.
How can you possibly claim it's not an API change?
i dunno, i agree with bruce here. we are just changing the output of
pg_locks a bit reflecting the change in moving contrib to core.
nobody cares about the literal output of pg_locks for userlocks except
the old contrib users. compatiblity could be supplied in the pgfoundry
module for this as well. i say to leave the lock tables alone and
change to 'advsiory'. it just seems odd the way it is.
merlin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
