"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it'd be better to attack this problem from the "other side"; > namely looking at what's actually cached.
You can kiss goodbye to plan stability if you go that route... and in any case I doubt the assumption that what's in shared buffers is representative of what's in kernel cache. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings