> > > > "x @< y" means "x is contained in y" > > > > > > ltree <@ ltree > > > > If you consider ltree entries to be sets containing all their children > > then those sound consistent.
Now we get to decide whether "<@" was better than the now proposed "@<" :-) I like <@. (or we stay clear by using the inet ops) Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
