Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the > >> corresponding SQL commands. > >> > >> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright > >> mistake. > > > Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal > > people liked it. I need someone else to say they want it reverted. > > I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution. > > As for "several people said they liked it", where? I don't see even > one followup to > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-06/msg00049.php
The issue is that the patch was at the end of a thread, and no one said they didn't like it, and no one said anything when it was placed in the patch queue. I take that as acceptance. But now that two people do not like it, patch reverted. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
