On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:10:44PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote: > BTW, this example works correct with -nolib-inline > (http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/clin/docs/main_cls/mergedprojects/copts_cls/ccpp_options/option_nolib_inline.htm): > % icc -O2 -nolib_inline -o 1 1.c&& ./1 > CALL cmp > SET SI = 1 > OK > > PS Have anybody any thoughts about workaround?
What does that option do? Is it practical to enable it for the entire backend? And isn't this a straightforward compiler bug they should be notified about? Sounds like the -fno-strict-aliasing option for gcc, the compiler is making some assumptions about the code that arn't true, so we tell the compiler not to do that. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
