"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It looks to me like we have implemented Windows' FILE_SHARE_DELETE
>> flag for open() calls but not for fopen(). Isn't this a problem?
>> We do use fopen() for stuff like pgstat.stat.
> That definitely sounds like a problem, there is no reason why the issue
> shouldn't occur for fopen(). Do you want to work up a patch for that
> based on open(), or do you want me to take a look at it?
It looks straightforward to apply our reimplemented pgwin32_open()
followed by fdopen(), but since I don't have a Windows build environment
I couldn't test the patch. Please take a look at it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
