Jonah H. Harris wrote:
Support of PGCluster-I, which we're discussing here, is being dropped in favor of the shared-disk PGCluster-II which was demonstrated at the anniversary conference. IIRC, PGCluster-I does use command-based replication but is merged into the parser in such a way as to make it work quite well--unlike the man-in-the-middle approach taken by pgpool.
Didn't Atsushi Mitani say he wanted to continue PgCluster-I? As they serve quite different needs that would make sense.
Regards Markus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
