Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think there is a reasonable case for saying that a manual vacuum could > hint pgstat to create the entry instead.
The problem with that is that a simple "VACUUM;" would force pgstat to populate its entire hashtable. Which more or less defeats the idea of not wasting table space on inactive tables --- and given the way the reporting-file mechanism works, there's definitely an incentive to not make the table bigger than it has to be. It wouldn't be so bad if pgstat had a mechanism for aging out unused table entries ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings