On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:02:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > >> If there was a mechanism to obtain > > >> field widths from the catalog there would be no need to store the > > >> field width in each tuple. This would be useful for other types as > > >> well (UUID and ENUM, for example). > > > > > I don't think there is concensus on adding that. > > > > Well, it's pie-in-the-sky at the moment because we have no credible > > design for doing it. Whether any given proposal would get accepted > > would depend on what its downsides were. > > > > Do we (or should we) have a TODO section for "blue sky research > > ideas"? I'd not object to putting an item like this in such a > > section. But for most of the TODO items we have a reasonably clear > > idea of what we're talking about, so this doesn't seem to belong > > in with the rest. > > Blue sky ideas just don't seem natural on the TODO list. Some people > wanted to use a wiki, and maybe it would be good for that.
I think it would be good to have something, so that people are occasionally reminded about these things. That's a good way to help shake ideas out. Something else to consider is that anything is doable, given enough effort, which is an argument for just putting it on the TODO. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq