Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>>> Until you have used this, it seems strange. After you start it doesn't > >>>> ;-) > >>> Sure, but with openness comes cruft, which can be a problem too. Do we > >>> want everyone's idea of a useful feature listed? I don't. > >> Why not as long as we have someone who can actually make "approved" > >> todos versus wishlist type stuff. > > > > So you want a wish-list wiki? Great idea, I can link to it from the > > TODO list. Is that all people want? > > Do you miss my point (not being sarcastic) about having: > > 1. Better descriptions about the todo/feature? E.g; feature specification
I am not sure there is enough churn of TODO items to make larger descriptions worth it. As it is, I have to link to new URLs as the TODO item is clarified. > 2. The ability to categorize todo items Categorize how? > 3. Heck *your portion* of the TODO would be easily satisfied by having a > single line with a link that points to the specific wiki page. But who is going to do that if no one has done anything in the past for the TODO list. I keep asking that. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
