On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:34:16AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Is it would be nice , if packages have been ; > > > 1. Package level variables (Public variables) > > is very hard for imlementation, and it's actually impossible. Needs large > changes in code > > 2. Package member level variables (Private variable) > > I plan it, in every PL language > > 3. Public and private package members > ?? I see sence only for functions. I don't wont supply schemas. > > >4. Syntax must be as closer as plpgsql (declaration, assingment etc) > >rather than any syntax that we have to learn :-) > PostgreSQL support other languages than PL/pgSQL. We need universal syntax > for plperl and others too
Why? Don't those other languages have support of their own for this? If we try and make this completely cross-language I fear we'll end up with something so watered down and obtuse that it'll be useless. I think it makes much more sense to design something for plpgsql and only commonize whatever it makes sense to. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
