Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:31:00PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > bruce wrote: > > > bruce wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, seems this should be a separate application, not done in the TODO > > > > list, and I am not willing to take on that additional workload. > > > > > > Let me add that anyone who has CVS commit access or wants to submit > > > TODO patches can keep the TODO updated in this way. > > > > I can also give someone ssh access to my server with the ability to > > modify only the TODO list. > > I've never submitted patches for the TODO because it seems pretty silly > to go through that much work just to add one line to a file, but being > able to change it directly would be a good compromise. I'd be happy to > help. > > Something else that bugs me about the current TODO process is there's a > lot of ideas that get brought up but never make it on there. Certainly > a lot of them aren't worth putting on there, but there's plenty of items > that get left on the floor. It would be nice if there was a better way > to deal with these ideas.
I have to be selective because having items we aren't sure we want on there isn't helpful. > One possibility: have a 'holding area' (perhaps on a Wiki) where users > could add use-cases for these ideas. If there's 'enough demand' (however > one defines that), they get promoted to the TODO. Note that this is > something geared towards users... things that are obviously useful to > -hackers tend to get on the list. Yea, that would be interesting, like a pending TODO item list. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
