Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> nonInVacuumXmin seems useless ... perhaps a vestige of some earlier >> version of the computation?
> Hmm, not useless at all really -- only a bug of mine. Turns out the > notInVacuumXmin stuff is essential, so I put it back. Uh, why? > I noticed something however -- in calculating the OldestXmin we always > consider all DBs, even though there is a parameter for skipping backends > not in the current DB -- this is because the Xmin we store in PGPROC is > always computed using all backends. The allDbs parameter only allows us > to skip the Xid of a transaction running elsewhere, but this is not very > helpful because the Xmin of transactions running in the local DB will > include those foreign Xids. Yeah, this has been recognized for some time. However the overhead of calculating local and global xmins in *every* transaction start is a significant reason not to do it. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly