Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This has been shot down many times before, and the arguments you are >> presenting are not new.
> Has there been a solution found for the arguments/issues. Is there any
> history about why at some point we decided to enforce the security
> option?
Read the list archives ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
