Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Or do you mean that you have stats_row_level and/or stats_block_level on >> in all four cases?
> yes - stats_row_level and stats_block_level on in all cases (sorry for > the confusion) - I can easily redo the tests without those - but that's > what I had in the running conf and I only remember that after I was > nearly done with all the testing :-) It'd be interesting to compare 8.1 and HEAD for the no-overhead case; I don't think you need to redo all four cases, but I'd like to see that one. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend