QingQing,
> I may have some free time recently to work on the master-slave scan idea.
> I've been able to support AS-IS both SeqScan and IndexScan. Are we still
> interested in getting it into 8.2?
I don't know about anyone else, but *I'm* still interested.
> There are still some problems I am not quite sure the solution. One is the
> Xid assignment -- we need this to assure that master and slaves see the
> same snapshot. The other is the connection pool architecture: shall we let
> postmaster manage the slaves or let another process say slave-master to
> handle them? Currently I am choosing the latter.
Hmmm. Why not the postmaster?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
