On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think we should try very hard to get rid of the longjmp in the signal > handler altogether. I notice it doesn't work anyway in the Windows > port, so this would improve portability as well as safety. The signal > handler should just set a flag that would be checked at safe points, > much as we do in the backend. (The bit about doing PQcancel can stay, > though, since that's carefully designed to be signal-safe.)
I submitted a patch for this ages ago and AFAIK it's still in the queue. Have you any issues with the way I did it there? Have a ncie day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
