On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:11 +0900, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Time (and timestamp) is a bit of a issue conceptually. The "default" > successor function would depend on the precision of the timestamp.
And in the ideal case it doesn't exist. That is why I think a closed, open
interval is a better way to go.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
