"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps it would be best to add a seperate set of functions that use
> boyer-moore, and reference them in appropriate places in the
> documentation. Unless someone has a better idea on how we can find out
> what people are actually doing in the field...
You've obviously missed the point of my concern, which is code bloat.
A parallel set of functions incorporating B-M would make things worse
not better from that standpoint. (Unless you are proposing that someone
do it as a separate pgfoundry project; which'd be fine with me. I'm
just concerned about how much we buy into as core features.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
