Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That seems like a very odd way to phrase that since just saying that the > sets of column names are equivalent would be enough for that and all the > extra words seem to only obscure the point.
As an example of clear well-written English, it certainly fails
miserably no matter which construction you put on it :-(.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
