Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The lack of documentation is easily fixed ;-).  I don't think this is
>> icky enough to justify breaking all the existing functions we'd
>> undoubtedly break if we changed it.

> We have tightened behaviour in ways much harder to fix in the past, e.g. 
> actually following UTF8 rules.

True, but there were clear benefits from doing so.  Disallowing "="
assignment in plpgsql wouldn't buy anything, just break programs.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to