"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Someone posted something on the DBD::Pg mailing list recently that
> made me wonder if the user's problem is more of a "don't do that"
> or something that may be solvable with a libpq or protocol change.
> Basically, the user has a rule which switches an insert to a select.
> They then want to run the insert, and pull the resulting tuples
> from it. This works fine when using PQexec, as it returns the latest
> result, which is PGRES_TUPLES_OK. However, when using the newer
> PQexec family (PQexecParams and PQexecPrepared), the only thing returned
> is PGRES_COMMAND_OK, which prevents the drawing of any subsequent tuples.
I'd call that a "don't do that" issue. The newer protocol is
specifically designed to be more predictable than the old, and that
includes not returning tuples from statements that clearly shouldn't
return anything.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
