Tom Lane wrote:
Why can PLs not handle pseudo-types?
No one's done the work to figure out which ones are sensible to support
and then add the logic needed to support them.
PL/Java will handle the RECORD type correctly. I'm just finalizing a new, more flexible,
type mapping implementation for PL/Java and it would be easy to add support for more pseudo
types too. But what others would make sense?
Kind Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
