The patch wasn't ignored. It is just that I never got to applying it yet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 12:15:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Markus Bertheau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why is it trying to use 5432? Am I missing something? Is that the > > > expected behaviour? > > > > > Michael Fuhr hinted that > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-02/msg00139.php > > > may be the cause of that. > > > > Confirmed here: \c drops the previous port connection setting (and > > the host too according to my testing). This is clearly a bug --- at > > least, there was no hint in the patch description that it would > > change the behavior of previously-accepted cases, and it would have > > had to withstand much more careful review if that were stated to be > > the case. > > I believe that this patch fixes the problem. Should there be > something in the regression tests for this? > > Cheers, > D > -- > David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ > phone: +1 415 235 3778 > > Remember to vote! [ Attachment, skipping... ] -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
