> > BTW, I found the answer to my question myself by reading the source > > code: if that's an index, then blockfreebytes is explicitly set to 0. > > I suggest that this should be noted in the README and in this case > > blockfreebytes is better to set to NULL, rather than 0. > > > > Good points! I had not noticed this test case. Probably NULL is better > than zero.
Just for curiousity, why FSM gathers info for indexes? I thought FSM is only good for tables. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
