On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Matteo Beccati wrote:
> >After all - you wouldn't want somebody to say that PostgreSQL copied
> >them, because the date was later, would you? :-)
> I think it won't be hard to understand what "Copyright (c) 1996-2006"
> means ;)
Maybe... but if it hasn't changed...
Of course, that whole line has no legal value in North America anyways...
Cheers,
mark
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
