Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Yes, I agree with him on that. However, there's a certain amount of > confusion inspired by the organization that: "If you want to look up the > table's columns go to information_schmea, if you want the table *size* > go to sysviews." But maybe that's unavoidable. Or maybe we could link > the information_schema views into pg_sysviews?
We could, but I'd argue that this makes sense only if the added PG-specific stuff looks like a seamless extension of the standard definitions. If there are obvious differences in naming style, table layout, etc, I'd expect such a setup to look more like a hodgepodge than a good idea. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly