Tom Lane wrote: > Any thoughts about details? My feeling is that we should tie RI > semantics to btree opclasses, same as we have done for ORDER BY > and some other SQL constructs, but I don't have a concrete proposal > right offhand. The btree idea may not cover cross-type FKs anyway.
This means getting rid of SPI usage, right? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
