Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I know we said we don't want to add an additional GUC variable just to
> control xact statistics, but I am thinking that using
> stat_command_string isn't a logical variable to use because it is
> unrelated to commutative statistics.
> I am thinking using row and block-level statistics to turn on xact
> statistics makes sense, but not to use stat_command_string for that
> purpose.
I don't see any strong logic to that, and changing the behavior just
for the sake of change doesn't appeal to me...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
