Where are we on this patch? I am thinking it should be in the most logical place, rather than in pg_ctl. One call isn't a big deal, especially if you can run the postmaster without using pg_ctl.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > If the job object code is moved to the postmaster, it'll > > work when not > > > running as a service as well. > > > > I'd just as soon keep all that Windows-specific cruft in pg_ctl. > > So I think the way you've got it set up is fine. > > Well, it'd all be localised to the backend/port/win32 directory of > course, except for a single call - where there is already "windows > cruft". > > But. I see your point. And the vast majority of production > installations run as service anyway. So I won't spend any time making > those changes, I'll leave what's on -patches now. > > //Magnus > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
