David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:17:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Seems to me that "psql -c 'COPY ...'" is a more likely front-end for
>> such a process.
> Actually, it's not. I'm attaching my preliminary patch, as I see I
> haven't explained it well enough.
The patch conveys nothing you didn't explain already, and I still don't
see why one would use pg_dump instead of psql. If you use pg_dump then
you have to cope with a pile of random SQL and comments as well as the
actual data.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
