On 12/8/2005 1:28 PM, Gustavo Tonini wrote:
Are you sure that no way to implement a generic aproach on the backend? What
You mean "generic" as in a replication system that can do asynchronous master-slave, asynchronous multimaster with conflict resolution based on timestamps, system priority or user defined resolution stubs, can do synchronous predicate locking but also does support thousands of asynchronous, partial replica (salesman on the road), and last but not least can run as a synchronous cluster in a LAN segment. All the above can of course be mixed together ... like a central cluster of 8 load balanced, fault tolerant systems, with async multimaster replica in all external branch servers, partial multimaster replica for the road warriers and some slave leaf nodes for reporting.
If you can present a prototype for the above, I am sure that we will change our opinion and finally settle for one, builtin replication system.
does specification say? Does Oracle 10g have a core implementation of replication (cluster)?
What specification? Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
