Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, a very simple test shows that the libintl printf does indeed do > %m$ processing: > ... > So the next question is why isn't it working in the build.
Is it possible that the build that was being complained of was using our previous, very-broken snprintf.c? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match