Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If people would like to see a detailed explanation of the
> interaction between strtol() and errno, a header comment to pg_strtol()
> seems a good place to put it. IMO that is better than copying and
> pasting a cryptic one-line comment to each and every callsite of
> strtol().
Next we'll be copying-and-pasting entire C-library man pages, no doubt.
I think this whole discussion is a waste of electrons, as are the
proposed comments. No one ever asked for extra documentation in the
original coding in pg_atoi, or the other dozen or so places where we
have historically checked the result of strtol. Why do we suddenly
feel it requires extra doc now?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
