Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We might be able to solve that for plpgsql, but in general we can't, > ISTM. What if I write a plperl function that loops forever? We have no > chance there to call CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS.
Yeah, I was thinking about that too. Still, we can/should/already did
fix it in plpgsql.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
