Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2005-09-08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> initdb is really the wrong place for this anyway, because in many >> situations (RPM installations for instance) initdb is run behind the >> scenes with no opportunity for user interaction. We should be doing >> our best to remove options from initdb, not add them.
> Running initdb behind the scenes is a proven dangerous practice; why > encourage it? I don't see anything particularly dangerous about it. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly