Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2005-09-08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> initdb is really the wrong place for this anyway, because in many
>> situations (RPM installations for instance) initdb is run behind the
>> scenes with no opportunity for user interaction.  We should be doing
>> our best to remove options from initdb, not add them.

> Running initdb behind the scenes is a proven dangerous practice; why
> encourage it?

I don't see anything particularly dangerous about it.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to