On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 02:34:50PM +0000, Matt Miller wrote:
> > > Rewriting all my Oracle code function-by-function could be painful
> > > ...
> > > I'm still trying to hold on to my fantasy that I can hack Postgres (and
> > > contrib/ora2pg) into submission.
> >
> > Why don't you just use EnterpriseDB?
>
> I looked at EnterpriseDB a few months ago. The installation errored.
> It left stuff in /var/opt, which I consider non-standard for a Red Hat
> machine. The whole product just didn't feel clean to me. I admit
> that's a pretty limited and subjective evaluation, especially for a beta
> product, but I was in the mode of broadly evaluating alternatives, so I
> moved on. Maybe I need to look at it again.
Well, the EnterpriseDB has much more support for Oracle syntax in
general, and PL/SQL in particular. If you didn't get past the
installation step, certainly you didn't have a feel of how the real
features work. May I suggest you at least get it working and try to
port your functions to it?
(Disclaimer: while I work for EDB, I haven't had any relationship to the
Oracle-PL/SQL layer yet, nor have I been involved at all in their
commercial offering.)
--
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"Having your biases confirmed independently is how scientific progress is
made, and hence made our great society what it is today" (Mary Gardiner)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
