--On måndag, augusti 22, 2005 09.19.58 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> I feel it makes sense to apply the smaller patch in any case, so that
> there's a Win32 solution not requiring ICU (ie, I can't see an argument
> for doing (2) rather than (3)).
>
> Comments?
I don't mind either way, but while Win32 will work with Magnus' patch,
FreeBSD won't; it needs the ICU patch to work. OTH, I maintain the
FreeBSD port where I already have the patch as an ("experiemental")
option. Not every FreeBSD user uses the ports system, though.
So, it is a question whether FreeBSD's unicode support is important or
not, I guess? Win32 will work both ways.
How is FreeBSD's Unicode support broken? I was not aware of that.
FreeBSD has no unicode collation support. Hence the need for ICU.
/Palle
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
