On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:13:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What do people think of exposing pg_usleep() to the user?
>
> I'm not real enthused about it. Generally speaking, a sleep() on the
> database side means you are idling while holding locks, and that does
> not seem like something we want to encourage people to do.
>
> As other responders noted, it's trivial to program this in any of the
> untrusted PL languages, So what you're really proposing is that we give
> sleep() to non-superusers, and that seems like a bit of a hard sell.
> Let's see a use-case or three.
There may be a better alternative, but wouldn't this let application
writers easily test the effects of a long running transaction?
-Mike
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
