Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL
means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations
where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.
Yes you are absolutely correct. However my argument was more than that.
Right.
I was responding to the entire thread that was headed in the direction
of saying that just because a language doe not have a trusted PL
version, it should be removed.
As others have said, I find myself using PL/pgSQL when I need trusted,
and frequently use other languages when I need untrusted. And in most of
my experience, I don't even care if the language is trusted or
untrusted. There are plenty of use cases for both.
Joe
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
