Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The correct lingo would be standard_conforming_strings. I'm going to change
that.
Sounds good.
No problem here either.
So does that mean for 8.1 it will be:
standard_conforming_strings = on/off
?
Another question is whether this should be backpatched to
our next 7.4.X or 8.0.X release as read-only variables.
Unnecessary; any client code written to use this need only assume that
absence of the parameter means the old behavior.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
