Tom Lane wrote:
Janko Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is currently anybody working on extending rtree_gist? I have seen, it is moved
to core now. I had a look at it and because I have some experience with PGSQL's
Gist API,
I would do the job.
What changes have you got in mind exactly?
At first, I would implement all RTREE supported operators in GIST.
Then, the GIST implementation may be a full replacement/alternative for RTREE.
Futhermore, I would implement all relationship operators, which are unsupported
in RTREE using GIST. As a consequence, the TODO item:
- Add rtree index support for line, lseg, path, point
can be marked as "done".
Regards,
Janko Richter
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
