Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
comments welcome (buildfarm exists to help people on this list - if you
want something speak up).
There are a number of buildfarm machines that don't seem to have *ever*
posted a successful run. In some cases this represents a genuine
portability issue but in others it looks more like local
misconfiguration. Can we do something to encourage people to fix these?
Yes. Thankyou for asking. Several of these have been inactive for quite
a while, and I will mark those as retired after giving their owners due
notice. Others I will chase up on a case by case basis.
We've never been completely clean on anything before REL8_0_STABLE, so
I'll be chasing the latest branches first. The obvious candidates are:
sysname | branch | latest
--------+---------------+---------------------
badger | HEAD | 2005-03-20 03:36:07
dove | HEAD | 2005-06-17 01:10:00
fantail | HEAD | 2004-12-06 23:04:43
muskrat | HEAD | 2005-01-10 22:16:41
osprey | HEAD | 2005-06-18 16:00:17
osprey | REL8_0_STABLE | 2005-06-17 22:00:17
penguin | REL8_0_STABLE | 2005-06-15 22:00:09
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
