"Mark Cave-Ayland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still a little nervous about dropping down to CRC32 from CRC64 and so > was just wondering what the net saving would be using one CRC64 across the > whole WAL record?
None to speak of; the startup/teardown time is trivial. It's the
per-byte cost that hurts.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
