Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only problem i have found until now is that > update v_foo set col1 = DEFAULT; execute nextval twice per every record. > so there will be a gasp between numbers, but AFAIK nextval has no guarantee > of returning sequential numbers.
While there's no guarantee that strong there's still an expected behaviour. sequences generate sequential numbers and only skip in specific cases. I think this would still surprise and bother most users. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq