Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the sequence, at least the relcache init file stuff looks if
> not broken at least a bit heavy-handed...
I was planning to change that ;-) ... using separate 2PC action records
for the relcache init file actions would make it much better.
> Now consider this scenario:
> backend A: Do updates that cause an init file invalidation
> backend A: Commit begins
> backend A: unlink init file
> backend B starts and recreates init file
> backend A: send inval message
> backend C starts and reads the now stale init file
No problem, because C will receive A's inval messages after that.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
