Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> [...] Is it sufficient to
>>> remember just the relation and the block number or do we need the
>>> contents a well?
> I meant the contents of the WAL record, not the original block
> contents. Anyway, I think it's not needed.
Oh, I see. Yes, it might be worth hanging onto for debugging purposes.
If we did get a report of such a failure, I'm sure we'd wish to know
what sort of WAL record triggered it. One trusts there won't be so many
that storing 'em all is a problem ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
