On Wed, 18 May 2005 04:31 am, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> > Last time it came up I thought the problem was that there was not a
> > consensus on *which* bugtracker to use.
>
> Or whether to use one. Roughly 1/3 bugzilla, 1/3 something else, and 1/3
> don't want a bugtracker. And, among the people who didn't want bugzilla,
> some were vehemently opposed to it. Bugtrackers discussed included GForge,
> bugzilla, RT, Roundup, Jura (they offered a free license) and a few I don't
> remember.
>
> > Incidentally, I'm not advocating we use bugzilla (if anything I think
> > I'd lean towards using RT), but this seems like a good opportunity to
> > note that as of a week or two ago bugzilla's HEAD branch supports using
> > PostgreSQL as its backing store, and this will be maintained.
>
> One of the things which came out of the bugtracker discussion is that
> anything
> we use must have the ability for developers to interact 100% by e-mail, as
> some critical developers will not use a web interface.
>
Doesn't pgfoundry offer this? If not in 3.3, I'm sure it's in Gforge 4.0, or
4.1 which will be
released soon.
Regards
Russell
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
