On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:48:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Isn't this bogus? > > > No. Note the comment immediately above, as well as the header comment > > for the function. > > OTOH, now that I think about it there's no reason whatever for that > bizarre call convention. Let's split the function into two: one to > expand an existing multixact, and one to make a multixact from two > regular xids.
No problem ... shall I write a patch, or did you do it already? -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
