Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:34AM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:


The idea: We are looking for a way to implement a synchronous single-master / multiple slaves systems.
Meanwhile we are able to serialize / deserialize WAL records and send them to a group communication system which transports those records to the slave database.
This is not hard to do.



In fact, I believe Command Prompt's Mammoth Replicator does exactly this.


Very close. We don't use the WAL (yet, slated for probably 8.1) but we
do use a transaction log shipping method. So the implementation is almost the same.


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.

Joshua,

This sounds interesting. If you don't use the WAL but a transaction log shipping - what does it mean in terms of PostgreSQL? Do you create your own transaction log?
What really interests me here: Where is you code located in order to make sure that this things can work reliably?


        Best regards,

                Hans

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/664/393 39 74
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to